When we’re asked to rate ourselves and others, we get glaring differences of opinion, but this isn’t necessarily a bad thing, writes Jim Bright.<\/strong><\/p>\n
One of the most frustrating and exciting aspects of life is that we never have the full story. Life is too complex to be able to reduce it to a single perspective. That is what makes it exciting.<\/p>\n
Leaders and managers think they are doing a pretty good job. If only the team members agreed!<\/p>\n
There is always something new to discover, there are always new possibilities, there is always hope.<\/p>\n
Most problems and disputes in life arise when we fail to appreciate that our knowledge is incomplete, our perspective not all-encompassing.<\/p>\n
I was reminded of these truths when reading the results of the recently published Leadership Employment and Direction<\/em> survey from Leadership Management Australia.<\/p>\n
The survey of 1300 people working largely in private companies reveals stark differences in the perspectives of staff at different levels in organisations.<\/p>\n
If you want to get an optimistic view of how things are going, talk to the executives or senior leaders.<\/p>\nSubscribe-banner-vertical<\/a>>A remarkable feature of the results is the degree of similarity between the executive leaders and the senior managers. For instance, their responses are more or less identical in agreeing that teams are sufficiently empowered.<\/p>\n
Sadly, more than one in four think their leaders and supervisors are not very competent.<\/p>\n
On the face of it, these statistics point to problems in organisations.<\/p>\n
That a quarter of staff see the leader as not competent is not necessarily such a bad thing.<\/p>\n
Jim Bright is professor of career education and development at ACU and owns Bright and Associates. Article originally published in the The Age <\/a>online on June 27, 2015
\n<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"